International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis

Sarah K. Wise; Sandra Y. Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R. Orlandi; Cezmi A. Akdis; Jeremiah A. Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M. Baroody; Claus Bachert; G. Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne Corey; Linda S. Cox; Peter Socrates Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam DeConde; John M. DelGaudio; Charles S. Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E. Flanagan; Wytske J. Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh Halderman; Robert G. Hamilton; Hans J. rgen Hoffman; Jens M. Hohlfeld; Steven M. Houser; Peter H. Hwang; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Deborah Jarvis; Ayesha N. Khalid; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Todd. T. Kingdom; Helene Krouse; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Adrienne M. Laury; Stella E. Lee; Joshua M. Levy; Amber U. Luong; Bradley F. Marple; Edward D. McCoul; K. Christopher McMains; Erik Melén; James W. Mims; Gianna Moscato; Joaquim Mullol; Harold S. Nelson; Monica Patadia; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Michael P. Platt; William Reisacher; Carmen Rondón; Luke Rudmik; Matthew Ryan; Joaquin Sastre; Rodney J. Schlosser; Russell A. Settipane; Hemant P. Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Timothy L. Smith; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; Jody R. Tversky; Maria C. Veling; De Yun Wang; Marit Westman; Magnus Wickman; Mark Zacharek

doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis

Sarah K. Wise, Sandra Y. Lin, Elina Toskala, Richard R. Orlandi, Cezmi A. Akdis, Jeremiah A. Alt, Antoine Azar, Fuad M. Baroody, Claus Bachert, G. Walter Canonica, Thomas Chacko, Cemal Cingi, Giorgio Ciprandi, Jacquelynne Corey, Linda S. Cox, Peter Socrates Creticos, Adnan Custovic, Cecelia Damask, Adam DeConde, John M. DelGaudioCharles S. Ebert, Jean Anderson Eloy, Carrie E. Flanagan, Wytske J. Fokkens, Christine Franzese, Jan Gosepath, Ashleigh Halderman, Robert G. Hamilton, Hans J. rgen Hoffman, Jens M. Hohlfeld, Steven M. Houser, Peter H. Hwang, Cristoforo Incorvaia, Deborah Jarvis, Ayesha N. Khalid, Maritta Kilpeläinen, Todd. T. Kingdom, Helene Krouse, Desiree Larenas-Linnemann, Adrienne M. Laury, Stella E. Lee, Joshua M. Levy, Amber U. Luong, Bradley F. Marple, Edward D. McCoul, K. Christopher McMains, Erik Melén, James W. Mims, Gianna Moscato, Joaquim Mullol, Harold S. Nelson, Monica Patadia, Ruby Pawankar, Oliver Pfaar, Michael P. Platt, William Reisacher, Carmen Rondón, Luke Rudmik, Matthew Ryan, Joaquin Sastre, Rodney J. Schlosser, Russell A. Settipane, Hemant P. Sharma, Aziz Sheikh, Timothy L. Smith, Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn, Jody R. Tversky, Maria C. Veling, De Yun Wang, Marit Westman, Magnus Wickman, Mark Zacharek

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

411 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	108-352
Journal	International forum of allergy & rhinology
Volume	8
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073 https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073_c
Publication status	Published - 2018

Access to Document

http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/150599/1/ICARPrimaryAuthorCOIForms1.pdf

Cite this

Wise, S. K., Lin, S. Y., Toskala, E., Orlandi, R. R., Akdis, C. A., Alt, J. A., Azar, A., Baroody, F. M., Bachert, C., Canonica, G. W., Chacko, T., Cingi, C., Ciprandi, G., Corey, J., Cox, L. S., Creticos, P. S., Custovic, A., Damask, C., DeConde, A., ... Zacharek, M. (2018). International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis. International forum of allergy & rhinology, 8(2), 108-352. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073, https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073_c

@article{d03ef26e97d94358a50581a94fde432d,

title = "International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis",

abstract = "Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding",

author = "Wise, {Sarah K.} and Lin, {Sandra Y.} and Elina Toskala and Orlandi, {Richard R.} and Akdis, {Cezmi A.} and Alt, {Jeremiah A.} and Antoine Azar and Baroody, {Fuad M.} and Claus Bachert and Canonica, {G. Walter} and Thomas Chacko and Cemal Cingi and Giorgio Ciprandi and Jacquelynne Corey and Cox, {Linda S.} and Creticos, {Peter Socrates} and Adnan Custovic and Cecelia Damask and Adam DeConde and DelGaudio, {John M.} and Ebert, {Charles S.} and Eloy, {Jean Anderson} and Flanagan, {Carrie E.} and Fokkens, {Wytske J.} and Christine Franzese and Jan Gosepath and Ashleigh Halderman and Hamilton, {Robert G.} and Hoffman, {Hans J. rgen} and Hohlfeld, {Jens M.} and Houser, {Steven M.} and Hwang, {Peter H.} and Cristoforo Incorvaia and Deborah Jarvis and Khalid, {Ayesha N.} and Maritta Kilpel{\"a}inen and Kingdom, {Todd. T.} and Helene Krouse and Desiree Larenas-Linnemann and Laury, {Adrienne M.} and Lee, {Stella E.} and Levy, {Joshua M.} and Luong, {Amber U.} and Marple, {Bradley F.} and McCoul, {Edward D.} and McMains, {K. Christopher} and Erik Mel{\'e}n and Mims, {James W.} and Gianna Moscato and Joaquim Mullol and Nelson, {Harold S.} and Monica Patadia and Ruby Pawankar and Oliver Pfaar and Platt, {Michael P.} and William Reisacher and Carmen Rond{\'o}n and Luke Rudmik and Matthew Ryan and Joaquin Sastre and Schlosser, {Rodney J.} and Settipane, {Russell A.} and Sharma, {Hemant P.} and Aziz Sheikh and Smith, {Timothy L.} and Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn and Tversky, {Jody R.} and Veling, {Maria C.} and Wang, {De Yun} and Marit Westman and Magnus Wickman and Mark Zacharek",

year = "2018",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "108--352",

journal = "International forum of allergy & rhinology",

issn = "2042-6976",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "2",

}

Wise, SK, Lin, SY, Toskala, E, Orlandi, RR, Akdis, CA, Alt, JA, Azar, A, Baroody, FM, Bachert, C, Canonica, GW, Chacko, T, Cingi, C, Ciprandi, G, Corey, J, Cox, LS, Creticos, PS, Custovic, A, Damask, C, DeConde, A, DelGaudio, JM, Ebert, CS, Eloy, JA, Flanagan, CE, Fokkens, WJ, Franzese, C, Gosepath, J, Halderman, A, Hamilton, RG, Hoffman, HJR, Hohlfeld, JM, Houser, SM, Hwang, PH, Incorvaia, C, Jarvis, D, Khalid, AN, Kilpeläinen, M, Kingdom, TT, Krouse, H, Larenas-Linnemann, D, Laury, AM, Lee, SE, Levy, JM, Luong, AU, Marple, BF, McCoul, ED, McMains, KC, Melén, E, Mims, JW, Moscato, G, Mullol, J, Nelson, HS, Patadia, M, Pawankar, R, Pfaar, O, Platt, MP, Reisacher, W, Rondón, C, Rudmik, L, Ryan, M, Sastre, J, Schlosser, RJ, Settipane, RA, Sharma, HP, Sheikh, A, Smith, TL, Tantilipikorn, P, Tversky, JR, Veling, MC, Wang, DY, Westman, M, Wickman, M & Zacharek, M 2018, 'International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis', International forum of allergy & rhinology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 108-352. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073, https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073_c

TY - JOUR

T1 - International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis

AU - Wise, Sarah K.

AU - Lin, Sandra Y.

AU - Toskala, Elina

AU - Orlandi, Richard R.

AU - Akdis, Cezmi A.

AU - Alt, Jeremiah A.

AU - Azar, Antoine

AU - Baroody, Fuad M.

AU - Bachert, Claus

AU - Canonica, G. Walter

AU - Chacko, Thomas

AU - Cingi, Cemal

AU - Ciprandi, Giorgio

AU - Corey, Jacquelynne

AU - Cox, Linda S.

AU - Creticos, Peter Socrates

AU - Custovic, Adnan

AU - Damask, Cecelia

AU - DeConde, Adam

AU - DelGaudio, John M.

AU - Ebert, Charles S.

AU - Eloy, Jean Anderson

AU - Flanagan, Carrie E.

AU - Fokkens, Wytske J.

AU - Franzese, Christine

AU - Gosepath, Jan

AU - Halderman, Ashleigh

AU - Hamilton, Robert G.

AU - Hoffman, Hans J. rgen

AU - Hohlfeld, Jens M.

AU - Houser, Steven M.

AU - Hwang, Peter H.

AU - Incorvaia, Cristoforo

AU - Jarvis, Deborah

AU - Khalid, Ayesha N.

AU - Kilpeläinen, Maritta

AU - Kingdom, Todd. T.

AU - Krouse, Helene

AU - Larenas-Linnemann, Desiree

AU - Laury, Adrienne M.

AU - Lee, Stella E.

AU - Levy, Joshua M.

AU - Luong, Amber U.

AU - Marple, Bradley F.

AU - McCoul, Edward D.

AU - McMains, K. Christopher

AU - Melén, Erik

AU - Mims, James W.

AU - Moscato, Gianna

AU - Mullol, Joaquim

AU - Nelson, Harold S.

AU - Patadia, Monica

AU - Pawankar, Ruby

AU - Pfaar, Oliver

AU - Platt, Michael P.

AU - Reisacher, William

AU - Rondón, Carmen

AU - Rudmik, Luke

AU - Ryan, Matthew

AU - Sastre, Joaquin

AU - Schlosser, Rodney J.

AU - Settipane, Russell A.

AU - Sharma, Hemant P.

AU - Sheikh, Aziz

AU - Smith, Timothy L.

AU - Tantilipikorn, Pongsakorn

AU - Tversky, Jody R.

AU - Veling, Maria C.

AU - Wang, De Yun

AU - Westman, Marit

AU - Wickman, Magnus

AU - Zacharek, Mark

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding

AB - Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088114105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073

DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073

M3 - Article

C2 - 29438602

SN - 2042-6976

VL - 8

SP - 108

EP - 352

JO - International forum of allergy & rhinology

JF - International forum of allergy & rhinology

IS - 2

ER -

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this