TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-Term Impact of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury
AU - Schreuder, Anne Marthe
AU - Busch, Olivier R.
AU - Besselink, Marc G.
AU - Ignatavicius, Povilas
AU - Gulbinas, Antanas
AU - Barauskas, Giedrius
AU - Gouma, Dirk J.
AU - van Gulik, Thomas M.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Background: Bile duct injury (BDI) is a devastating complication following cholecystectomy. After initial management of BDI, patients stay at risk for late complications including anastomotic strictures, recurrent cholangitis, and secondary biliary cirrhosis. Methods: We provide a comprehensive overview of current literature on the long-Term outcome of BDI. Considering the availability of only limited data regarding treatment of anastomotic strictures in literature, we also retrospectively analyzed patients with anastomotic strictures following a hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) from a prospectively maintained database of 836 BDI patients. Results: Although clinical outcomes of endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical treatment of BDI are good with success rates of around 90%, quality of life (QoL) may be impaired even after "clinically successful" treatment. Following surgical treatment, the incidence of anastomotic strictures varies from 5 to 69%, with most studies reporting incidences around 10-20%. The median time to stricture formation varies between 11 and 30 months. Long-Term BDI-related mortality varies between 1.8 and 4.6%. Of 91 patients treated in our center for anastomotic strictures after HJ, 81 (89%) were treated by percutaneous balloon dilatation, with a long-Term success rate of 77%. Twenty-four patients primarily or secondarily underwent surgical revision, with recurrent strictures occurring in 21%. Conclusions: The long-Term impact of BDI is considerable, both in terms of clinical outcomes and QoL. Treatment should be performed in tertiary expert centers to optimize outcomes. Patients require a long-Term follow-up to detect anastomotic strictures. Strictures should initially be managed by percutaneous dilatation, with surgical revision as a next step in treatment.
AB - Background: Bile duct injury (BDI) is a devastating complication following cholecystectomy. After initial management of BDI, patients stay at risk for late complications including anastomotic strictures, recurrent cholangitis, and secondary biliary cirrhosis. Methods: We provide a comprehensive overview of current literature on the long-Term outcome of BDI. Considering the availability of only limited data regarding treatment of anastomotic strictures in literature, we also retrospectively analyzed patients with anastomotic strictures following a hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) from a prospectively maintained database of 836 BDI patients. Results: Although clinical outcomes of endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical treatment of BDI are good with success rates of around 90%, quality of life (QoL) may be impaired even after "clinically successful" treatment. Following surgical treatment, the incidence of anastomotic strictures varies from 5 to 69%, with most studies reporting incidences around 10-20%. The median time to stricture formation varies between 11 and 30 months. Long-Term BDI-related mortality varies between 1.8 and 4.6%. Of 91 patients treated in our center for anastomotic strictures after HJ, 81 (89%) were treated by percutaneous balloon dilatation, with a long-Term success rate of 77%. Twenty-four patients primarily or secondarily underwent surgical revision, with recurrent strictures occurring in 21%. Conclusions: The long-Term impact of BDI is considerable, both in terms of clinical outcomes and QoL. Treatment should be performed in tertiary expert centers to optimize outcomes. Patients require a long-Term follow-up to detect anastomotic strictures. Strictures should initially be managed by percutaneous dilatation, with surgical revision as a next step in treatment.
KW - Anastomotic stricture
KW - Bile duct injury
KW - Bile leakage
KW - Cholecystectomy
KW - Long-Term outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060235361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1159/000496432
DO - https://doi.org/10.1159/000496432
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30654363
SN - 0253-4886
VL - 37
SP - 10
EP - 21
JO - Digestive Surgery
JF - Digestive Surgery
IS - 1
ER -