TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
AU - Franken, L. C.
AU - van der Poel, M. J.
AU - Latenstein, A. E. J.
AU - Zwart, M. J.
AU - Roos, E.
AU - Busch, O. R.
AU - Besselink, M. G.
AU - van Gulik, T. M.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is quickly becoming mainstream in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery because of presumed advantages. Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is highly demanding which may hamper the feasibility and safety of MIS in this setting. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on MIS for PHC. A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched and all studies describing MIS in patients with PHC were included. Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed by two independent researchers. Overall, 21 studies reporting on a total of 142 MIS procedures for PHC were included. These included 82 laparoscopic, 59 robot-assisted and 1 hybrid procedure(s). Risk of bias was deemed substantial. Pooled conversion rate was 7/142 (4.9%), pooled morbidity 30/126 (23.8%), and pooled mortality rate 4/126 (3.2%). The only comparative study, comparing 10 robot-assisted procedures to 32 open procedures, reported a significant increased operative time and higher morbidity rate with MIS. The available evidence on MIS for PHC is limited and generally of poor quality. This systematic review shows that the implementation of MIS for patients with PHC is still in its infancy.
AB - Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is quickly becoming mainstream in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery because of presumed advantages. Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is highly demanding which may hamper the feasibility and safety of MIS in this setting. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on MIS for PHC. A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched and all studies describing MIS in patients with PHC were included. Data extraction and risk of bias were assessed by two independent researchers. Overall, 21 studies reporting on a total of 142 MIS procedures for PHC were included. These included 82 laparoscopic, 59 robot-assisted and 1 hybrid procedure(s). Risk of bias was deemed substantial. Pooled conversion rate was 7/142 (4.9%), pooled morbidity 30/126 (23.8%), and pooled mortality rate 4/126 (3.2%). The only comparative study, comparing 10 robot-assisted procedures to 32 open procedures, reported a significant increased operative time and higher morbidity rate with MIS. The available evidence on MIS for PHC is limited and generally of poor quality. This systematic review shows that the implementation of MIS for patients with PHC is still in its infancy.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85065398808&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049774
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00964-9
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00964-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31049774
SN - 1863-2483
VL - 13
SP - 717
EP - 727
JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery
JF - Journal of Robotic Surgery
IS - 6
ER -