Multi-class glioma segmentation on real-world data with missing MRI sequences: comparison of three deep learning algorithms

Hugh G. Pemberton, Jiaming Wu, Ivar Kommers, Domenique M. J. Müller, Yipeng Hu, Olivia Goodkin, Sjoerd B. Vos, Sotirios Bisdas, Pierre A. Robe, Hilko Ardon, Lorenzo Bello, Marco Rossi, Tommaso Sciortino, Marco Conti Nibali, Mitchel S. Berger, Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper, Wim Bouwknegt, Wimar A. van den Brink, Julia Furtner, Seunggu J. HanAlbert J. S. Idema, Barbara Kiesel, Georg Widhalm, Alfred Kloet, Michiel Wagemakers, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Sandro M. Krieg, Emmanuel Mandonnet, Ferran Prados, Philip de Witt Hamer, Frederik Barkhof, Roelant S. Eijgelaar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study tests the generalisability of three Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge models using a multi-center dataset of varying image quality and incomplete MRI datasets. In this retrospective study, DeepMedic, no-new-Unet (nn-Unet), and NVIDIA-net (nv-Net) were trained and tested using manual segmentations from preoperative MRI of glioblastoma (GBM) and low-grade gliomas (LGG) from the BraTS 2021 dataset (1251 in total), in addition to 275 GBM and 205 LGG acquired clinically across 12 hospitals worldwide. Data was split into 80% training, 5% validation, and 15% internal test data. An additional external test-set of 158 GBM and 69 LGG was used to assess generalisability to other hospitals’ data. All models’ median Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for both test sets were within, or higher than, previously reported human inter-rater agreement (range of 0.74–0.85). For both test sets, nn-Unet achieved the highest DSC (internal = 0.86, external = 0.93) and the lowest Hausdorff distances (10.07, 13.87 mm, respectively) for all tumor classes (p < 0.001). By applying Sparsified training, missing MRI sequences did not statistically affect the performance. nn-Unet achieves accurate segmentations in clinical settings even in the presence of incomplete MRI datasets. This facilitates future clinical adoption of automated glioma segmentation, which could help inform treatment planning and glioma monitoring.

Original languageEnglish
Article number18911
JournalScientific reports
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2023

Cite this