Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | E578-E584 |
Journal | Annals of surgery |
Volume | 277 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2023 |
Keywords
- appendectomy
- appendicitis
- histopathology
- pathology
- routine
- selective
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Annals of surgery, Vol. 277, No. 3, 01.03.2023, p. E578-E584.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Oncological Safety and Potential Cost Savings of Routine vs Selective Histopathological Examination After Appendectomy
T2 - Results of the Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional FANCY Study
AU - Bastiaenen, Vivian P.
AU - de Jonge, Joske
AU - Corten, Bartholomeus J. G. A.
AU - de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J.
AU - Kraima, Anne C.
AU - Swank, Hilko A.
AU - van Vliet, Jaap L. P.
AU - van Acker, Gijs J. D.
AU - van Geloven, Anna A. W.
AU - in'tHof, Klaas H.
AU - Koens, Lianne
AU - de Reuver, Philip R.
AU - van Rossem, Charles C.
AU - Slooter, Gerrit D.
AU - Tanis, Pieter J.
AU - Terpstra, Valeska
AU - Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W.
AU - Bemelman, Willem A.
AU - Amelung, F. J.
AU - Atema, J. J.
AU - Bessems, S.
AU - Beunders, A. A. M.
AU - Bodewes, T. C. F.
AU - den Boer, F. C.
AU - Boerma, D.
AU - Boerma, E. G.
AU - van den Boezem, P.
AU - Bökkerink, W. J. V.
AU - van den Boogaart, D.
AU - Boogerd, L. S. F.
AU - Bouwman, H.
AU - Broos, A.
AU - Brueren, L. O.
AU - Bruinsma, W. E.
AU - Bruns, E. R. C.
AU - Castelijns, P. S. S.
AU - de Castro, S. M. M.
AU - Consten, E. C. J.
AU - Crolla, R. M. P. H.
AU - Dam, M. J.
AU - Dang, Q.
AU - Dekker, J. W. T.
AU - Deroose, J. P.
AU - Devriendt, S.
AU - Dijkema, E. J.
AU - Dijkstra, N.
AU - Driessen, M. L. S.
AU - van Duijvendijk, P.
AU - Duinhouwer, L. E.
AU - van Duyn, E. B.
AU - el-Massoudi, Y.
AU - Elfrink, A. K. E.
AU - Elschot, J. H.
AU - van Essen, J. A.
AU - Ferenschild, F. T. J.
AU - Gans, S. L.
AU - Gaznay, C.
AU - Geraedts, A. C. M.
AU - van Gessel, B. S. H.
AU - Giesen, L. J. X.
AU - van Gils, N.
AU - Gorgec, B.
AU - Gorter, R. R.
AU - Govaert, K. M.
AU - Greuter, G. N.
AU - van Grevenstein, W. M. U.
AU - Groot, L.
AU - Hardy, J. C. A.
AU - Heemskerk, J.
AU - Heeren, J. F.
AU - Heidotting, J.
AU - Heikens, J. T.
AU - Hosseinzoi, E.
AU - van Iersel, J. J.
AU - Inberg, B.
AU - Jansen, L. J.
AU - Jens, A. J. T.
AU - Jilesen, A. P. J.
AU - Joosten, M.
AU - de Jong, L.
AU - Keijzers, M.
AU - Klicks, R. J.
AU - Kloppenberg, F. W. H.
AU - Koedam, T. W. A.
AU - Koëter, T.
AU - Konsten, J. L. M.
AU - Koolen, L. J. E. R.
AU - Kruyt, Ph. M.
AU - Lange, J. F. M.
AU - Lavrijssen, B. D. A.
AU - de Leede, E. M.
AU - Leliefeld, P. H. C.
AU - Linnemann, R. J. A.
AU - Lo, G. C.
AU - van de Loo, M.
AU - Lubbert, P. H. W.
AU - Holzik, M. F. Lutke
AU - Manusama, E.
AU - Masselink, I.
AU - Matthée, E. P. C.
AU - Matthijsen, R. A.
AU - Mearadji, A.
AU - Melenhorst, J.
AU - Merkus, J. W. S.
AU - Michiels, T. D.
AU - Moes, D. E.
AU - Moossdorff, M.
AU - Mulder, E.
AU - Nallayici, E. G.
AU - Neijenhuis, P. A.
AU - Nielsen, K.
AU - Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P.
AU - Nijhuis, J.
AU - Okkema, S.
AU - Olthof, P. B.
AU - van Onkelen, R. S.
AU - van Oostendorp, S. E.
AU - Plaisier, P. W.
AU - Polle, S. W.
AU - Reiber, B. M. M.
AU - Reichert, F. C. M.
AU - van Rest, K. L. C.
AU - van Rijn, R.
AU - Roozendaal, N. C.
AU - de Ruijter, W. M. J.
AU - Schat, E.
AU - Scheerhoorn, J.
AU - Scheijmans, J. C. G.
AU - Schimmer, J.
AU - Schipper, R. J.
AU - Schouten, R.
AU - Schreurs, W. H.
AU - Schrijver, W. A. M. E.
AU - Shapiro, J.
AU - Siemons, A.
AU - Silvis, R.
AU - Simkens, G. A.
AU - Smakman, N.
AU - Smeets, B. J. J.
AU - Sonneveld, D. J. A.
AU - van Suijlichem, M.
AU - Talsma, A. K.
AU - Thoolen, J. M. M.
AU - van Tol, R. R.
AU - Tournoij, E.
AU - Tseng, L. N. L.
AU - Tuynman, J. B.
AU - van der Velde, K.
AU - Veltkamp, S. C.
AU - Verbeek, F. P. R.
AU - Verdaasdonk, E.
AU - Verhaak, T.
AU - Verheuvel, N. C.
AU - Vermaas, M.
AU - Verseveld, M.
AU - Vlek, S.
AU - Vogels, S.
AU - van de Voort, E. M. F.
AU - van Vugt, S. T.
AU - Wegdam, J. A.
AU - Wennekers, M. M.
AU - Wiering, B.
AU - de Wijkerslooth, E. M. L.
AU - Wijkmans, A. A.
AU - Wijnhoven, B. P. L.
AU - Witjes, C. D. M.
AU - Wolfhagen, N.
AU - de Zeeuw, S.
AU - van Zoonen, G.
N1 - Funding Information: This study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), of which the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, and the Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research are the main commissioning organisations. The funder of this study had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Objective: To investigate the oncological safety and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination after appendectomy. Background: The necessity of routine histopathological examination after appendectomy has been questioned, but prospective studies investigating the safety of a selective policy are lacking. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study, inspection and palpation of the (meso)appendix was performed by the surgeon in patients with suspected appendicitis. The surgeon's opinion on additional value of histopathological examination was reported before sending all specimens to the pathologist. Main outcomes were the number of hypothetically missed appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences benefiting the patient (upper limit two-sided 95% confidence interval below 3:1000 considered oncologically safe) and potential cost savings after selective histopathological examination. Results: Seven thousand three hundred thirty-nine patients were included. After a selective policy, 4966/7339 (67.7%) specimens would have been refrained from histopathological examination. Appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences would have been missed in 22/4966 patients. In 5/22, residual disease was completely resected during additional surgery. Hence, an appendiceal neoplasm with clinical consequences benefiting the patient would have been missed in 1.01:1000 patients (upper limit 95% confidence interval 1.61:1000). In contrast, twice as many patients (10/22) would not have been exposed to potential harm due to re-resections without clear benefit, whereas consequences were neither beneficial nor harmful in the remaining seven. Estimated cost savings established by replacing routine for selective histopathological examination were 725,400 per 10,000 patients. Conclusions: Selective histopathological examination after appendectomy for suspected appendicitis is oncologically safe and will likely result in a reduction of pathologists' workload, less costs, and fewer re-resections without clear benefit.
AB - Objective: To investigate the oncological safety and potential cost savings of selective histopathological examination after appendectomy. Background: The necessity of routine histopathological examination after appendectomy has been questioned, but prospective studies investigating the safety of a selective policy are lacking. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study, inspection and palpation of the (meso)appendix was performed by the surgeon in patients with suspected appendicitis. The surgeon's opinion on additional value of histopathological examination was reported before sending all specimens to the pathologist. Main outcomes were the number of hypothetically missed appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences benefiting the patient (upper limit two-sided 95% confidence interval below 3:1000 considered oncologically safe) and potential cost savings after selective histopathological examination. Results: Seven thousand three hundred thirty-nine patients were included. After a selective policy, 4966/7339 (67.7%) specimens would have been refrained from histopathological examination. Appendiceal neoplasms with clinical consequences would have been missed in 22/4966 patients. In 5/22, residual disease was completely resected during additional surgery. Hence, an appendiceal neoplasm with clinical consequences benefiting the patient would have been missed in 1.01:1000 patients (upper limit 95% confidence interval 1.61:1000). In contrast, twice as many patients (10/22) would not have been exposed to potential harm due to re-resections without clear benefit, whereas consequences were neither beneficial nor harmful in the remaining seven. Estimated cost savings established by replacing routine for selective histopathological examination were 725,400 per 10,000 patients. Conclusions: Selective histopathological examination after appendectomy for suspected appendicitis is oncologically safe and will likely result in a reduction of pathologists' workload, less costs, and fewer re-resections without clear benefit.
KW - appendectomy
KW - appendicitis
KW - histopathology
KW - pathology
KW - routine
KW - selective
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136212688&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072428
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005228
DO - https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005228
M3 - Article
C2 - 35072428
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 277
SP - E578-E584
JO - Annals of surgery
JF - Annals of surgery
IS - 3
ER -