Pan-European survey on the implementation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery with emphasis on cancer

Thijs de Rooij, Marc G. Besselink, Awad Shamali, Giovanni Butturini, Olivier R. Busch, Bjørn Edwin, Roberto Troisi, Laureano Fernández-Cruz, Ibrahim Dagher, Claudio Bassi, Mohammad Abu Hilal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Minimally invasive (MI) pancreatic surgery appears to be gaining popularity, but its implementation throughout Europe and the opinions regarding its use in pancreatic cancer patients are unknown. A 30-question survey was sent between June and December 2014 to pancreatic surgeons of the European Pancreatic Club, European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association and 5 European national pancreatic societies. Incomplete responses were excluded. In total, 237 pancreatic surgeons responded. After excluding 34 incomplete responses, 203 responses from 27 European countries were included. 164 (81%) surgeons were employed at a university hospital, 184 (91%) performed advanced MI surgery and 148 (73%) performed MI distal pancreatectomy. MI pancreatoduodenectomy was performed by 42 (21%) surgeons, whereas 9 (4.4%) surgeons had performed more than 10 procedures. Robot-assisted MI pancreatic surgery was performed by 28 (14%) surgeons. 63 (31%) surgeons expected MI distal pancreatectomy for cancer to be inferior to open distal pancreatectomy concerning oncological outcomes. 151 (74%) surgeons expected to benefit from training in MI distal pancreatectomy and 149 (73%) were willing to participate in a randomized trial on this topic. MI distal pancreatectomy is a common procedure, although its use for cancer is still disputed. MI pancreatoduodenectomy is still an uncommon procedure. Specific training and a randomized trial regarding MI pancreatic cancer surgery are welcomed
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-176
JournalHPB: The official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this