TY - JOUR
T1 - Similar Microcirculatory Alterations in Patients with Normodynamic and Hyperdynamic Septic Shock
AU - Edul, Vanina S. Kanoore
AU - Ince, Can
AU - Vazquez, Alejandro Risso
AU - Rubatto, Paolo N.
AU - Espinoza, Emilio D. Valenzuela
AU - Welsh, Sebastián
AU - Enrico, Carolina
AU - Dubin, Arnaldo
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Rationale: In normodynamic septic shock, the quantitative assessment of sublingual microcirculation has shown decreases in perfused vascular density and red blood cell velocity. However, no studies have been performed in hyperdynamic septic shock. Objectives: To characterize the microcirculatory patterns and rule out the presence of fast red blood cell velocity in patients with hyperdynamic septic shock. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the sublingual microcirculation in healthy volunteers (n = 20) and in patients with hyperdynamic (n = 20) and normodynamic (n = 20) septic shock. Hyperdynamic septic shock was defined by a cardiac index >4.0 L/min/m(2). The microcirculation was assessed with sidestream dark field imaging and AVA 3.0 software. Measurements and Main Results: There were no differences in perfused vascular density, proportion of perfused vessels, or microvascular flow index between patients with hyperdynamic and normodynamic septic shock, but these variables were reduced compared with those of healthy volunteers, A similar pattern was observed in red blood cell velocity (9126291, 9686204, and 13036 120 mm/s, respectively; P <0.0001) and its coefficient of variation. In both types of septic shock, no microvessel had a red blood cell velocity higher than the 100th percentile value for healthy volunteers. Conclusions: Patients with hyperdynamic septic shock showed microcirculatory alterations similar to those of patients with normal cardiac output. Both groups of patients had reduced perfused vascular density and red blood cell velocity and increased flow heterogeneity compared with that of healthy subjects. Fast red blood cell velocity was not found, even in patients with high cardiac output. These results support the conclusion that microcirculatory function is frequently dissociated from systemic hemodynamic derangements in septic shock
AB - Rationale: In normodynamic septic shock, the quantitative assessment of sublingual microcirculation has shown decreases in perfused vascular density and red blood cell velocity. However, no studies have been performed in hyperdynamic septic shock. Objectives: To characterize the microcirculatory patterns and rule out the presence of fast red blood cell velocity in patients with hyperdynamic septic shock. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the sublingual microcirculation in healthy volunteers (n = 20) and in patients with hyperdynamic (n = 20) and normodynamic (n = 20) septic shock. Hyperdynamic septic shock was defined by a cardiac index >4.0 L/min/m(2). The microcirculation was assessed with sidestream dark field imaging and AVA 3.0 software. Measurements and Main Results: There were no differences in perfused vascular density, proportion of perfused vessels, or microvascular flow index between patients with hyperdynamic and normodynamic septic shock, but these variables were reduced compared with those of healthy volunteers, A similar pattern was observed in red blood cell velocity (9126291, 9686204, and 13036 120 mm/s, respectively; P <0.0001) and its coefficient of variation. In both types of septic shock, no microvessel had a red blood cell velocity higher than the 100th percentile value for healthy volunteers. Conclusions: Patients with hyperdynamic septic shock showed microcirculatory alterations similar to those of patients with normal cardiac output. Both groups of patients had reduced perfused vascular density and red blood cell velocity and increased flow heterogeneity compared with that of healthy subjects. Fast red blood cell velocity was not found, even in patients with high cardiac output. These results support the conclusion that microcirculatory function is frequently dissociated from systemic hemodynamic derangements in septic shock
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-606OC
DO - https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-606OC
M3 - Article
C2 - 26624559
SN - 2325-6621
VL - 13
SP - 240
EP - 247
JO - Annals of the American Thoracic Society
JF - Annals of the American Thoracic Society
IS - 2
ER -