Team functioning in Neurorehabilitation: a mixed methods study

Ruud van der Veen, Stéphanie van der Burgt, Marsh Königs, Jaap Oosterlaan, Saskia Peerdeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The objective of this study was to enhance understanding of team functioning in a neurorehabilitation team by identifying the factors that impede and facilitate effective interprofessional team collaboration. We focused on team identification, psychological safety, and team learning, and conducted the research at a neurorehabilitation center treating young patients with severe acquired brain injury in the Netherlands. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating quantitative data from questionnaires (N = 40) with qualitative insights from a focus group (n = 6) and in-depth interviews (n = 5) to provide a comprehensive perspective on team dynamics. Findings revealed strong team identification among participants, denoting a shared sense of belonging and commitment. However, limited psychological safety was observed, which negatively affected constructive conflict and team learning. Qualitative analysis further identified deficiencies in shared mental models, especially in shared decision-making and integrated care. These results highlight the crucial role of psychological safety in team learning and the development of shared mental models in neurorehabilitation settings. Although specific to neurorehabilitation, the insights gained may be applicable to enhancing team collaboration in various healthcare environments. The study forms a basis for future research to investigate the impact of improvements in team functioning on patient outcomes in similar settings.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Interprofessional Care
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • Acquired brain injury
  • interprofessional teams
  • neurorehabilitation
  • team functioning

Cite this