The Quandary of Preresection Biliary Drainage for Pancreatic Cancer

Johanna A. M. G. Tol, Olivier R. C. Busch, Niels A. van der Gaag, Thomas M. van Gulik, Dirk J. Gouma

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surgery in patients with obstructive jaundice caused by a tumor in the pancreatic head area is associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications. Preoperative biliary drainage was introduced in an attempt to improve the general condition and reduce morbidity and mortality. Extensive experimental studies have been performed to analyze the beneficial effect of biliary drainage and showed improvement in liver function, nutritional status, and cell-mediated immune function as well as reduction in mortality. However, despite the results seen in the experimental studies, clinical studies reported both beneficial and adverse effects, and most studies advised against routinely performing preoperative biliary drainage. To add clarity to the ongoing controversy, a recent randomized controlled trial was performed and reported more overall complications in patients with jaundice who underwent preoperative biliary drainage followed by surgery compared to those who underwent surgery alone. Many of these complications were stent related. Like most clinical studies, a plastic stent was used to initiate biliary drainage. Patients with jaundice because of a tumor in the pancreatic head area without locoregional irresectability or metastases should be candidates for early surgery. Preoperative biliary drainage should not be performed routinely. However, some selected patients might benefit from preoperative biliary drainage, in cases of severe jaundice, neoadjuvant therapy, or postponed surgery due to logistics. In these cases, the use of metal biliary stents is indicated
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)550-554
JournalCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this