The road ahead in clinical network neuroscience

Linda Douw; Edwin van Dellen; Alida A. Gouw; Alessandra Griffa; Willem de Haan; Martijn van den Heuvel; Arjan Hillebrand; Piet Van Mieghem; Ida A. Nissen; Willem M. Otte; Yael D. Reijmer; Menno M. Schoonheim; Mario Senden; Elisabeth C.W. van Straaten; Betty M. Tijms; Prejaas Tewarie; Cornelis J. Stam

doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00103

The road ahead in clinical network neuroscience

Linda Douw, Edwin van Dellen, Alida A. Gouw, Alessandra Griffa, Willem de Haan, Martijn van den Heuvel, Arjan Hillebrand, Piet Van Mieghem, Ida A. Nissen, Willem M. Otte, Yael D. Reijmer, Menno M. Schoonheim, Mario Senden, Elisabeth C.W. van Straaten, Betty M. Tijms, Prejaas Tewarie, Cornelis J. Stam

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Academic › peer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical network neuroscience, the study of brain network topology in neurological and psychiatric diseases, has become a mainstay field within clinical neuroscience. Being a multidisciplinary group of clinical network neuroscience experts based in The Netherlands, we often discuss the current state of the art and possible avenues for future investigations. These discussions revolve around questions like “How do dynamic processes alter the underlying structural network?” and “Can we use network neuroscience for disease classification?” This opinion paper is an incomplete overview of these discussions and expands on ten questions that may potentially advance the field. By no means intended as a review of the current state of the field, it is instead meant as a conversation starter and source of inspiration to others.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	969-993
Number of pages	25
Journal	Network Neuroscience
Volume	3
Issue number	4
Early online date	23 Sept 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00103
Publication status	Published - Oct 2019

Keywords

Clinical application
Computational modeling
Connectome
Graph analysis
Network neuroscience
Neuroimaging
Neurophysiology

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00103

Cite this

Douw, L., van Dellen, E., Gouw, A. A., Griffa, A., de Haan, W., van den Heuvel, M., Hillebrand, A., Van Mieghem, P., Nissen, I. A., Otte, W. M., Reijmer, Y. D., Schoonheim, M. M., Senden, M., van Straaten, E. C. W., Tijms, B. M., Tewarie, P., & Stam, C. J. (2019). The road ahead in clinical network neuroscience. Network Neuroscience, 3(4), 969-993. https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00103

@article{e59cca5bbba644e5bb3b62e306e929ce,

title = "The road ahead in clinical network neuroscience",

abstract = "Clinical network neuroscience, the study of brain network topology in neurological and psychiatric diseases, has become a mainstay field within clinical neuroscience. Being a multidisciplinary group of clinical network neuroscience experts based in The Netherlands, we often discuss the current state of the art and possible avenues for future investigations. These discussions revolve around questions like “How do dynamic processes alter the underlying structural network?” and “Can we use network neuroscience for disease classification?” This opinion paper is an incomplete overview of these discussions and expands on ten questions that may potentially advance the field. By no means intended as a review of the current state of the field, it is instead meant as a conversation starter and source of inspiration to others.",

keywords = "Clinical application, Computational modeling, Connectome, Graph analysis, Network neuroscience, Neuroimaging, Neurophysiology",

author = "Linda Douw and {van Dellen}, Edwin and Gouw, {Alida A.} and Alessandra Griffa and {de Haan}, Willem and {van den Heuvel}, Martijn and Arjan Hillebrand and {Van Mieghem}, Piet and Nissen, {Ida A.} and Otte, {Willem M.} and Reijmer, {Yael D.} and Schoonheim, {Menno M.} and Mario Senden and {van Straaten}, {Elisabeth C.W.} and Tijms, {Betty M.} and Prejaas Tewarie and Stam, {Cornelis J.}",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2019 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.",

year = "2019",

month = oct,

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00103",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

pages = "969--993",

journal = "Network Neuroscience",

issn = "2472-1751",

publisher = "MIT Press Journals",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The road ahead in clinical network neuroscience

AU - Douw, Linda

AU - van Dellen, Edwin

AU - Gouw, Alida A.

AU - Griffa, Alessandra

AU - de Haan, Willem

AU - van den Heuvel, Martijn

AU - Hillebrand, Arjan

AU - Van Mieghem, Piet

AU - Nissen, Ida A.

AU - Otte, Willem M.

AU - Reijmer, Yael D.

AU - Schoonheim, Menno M.

AU - Senden, Mario

AU - van Straaten, Elisabeth C.W.

AU - Tijms, Betty M.

AU - Tewarie, Prejaas

AU - Stam, Cornelis J.

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Clinical network neuroscience, the study of brain network topology in neurological and psychiatric diseases, has become a mainstay field within clinical neuroscience. Being a multidisciplinary group of clinical network neuroscience experts based in The Netherlands, we often discuss the current state of the art and possible avenues for future investigations. These discussions revolve around questions like “How do dynamic processes alter the underlying structural network?” and “Can we use network neuroscience for disease classification?” This opinion paper is an incomplete overview of these discussions and expands on ten questions that may potentially advance the field. By no means intended as a review of the current state of the field, it is instead meant as a conversation starter and source of inspiration to others.

AB - Clinical network neuroscience, the study of brain network topology in neurological and psychiatric diseases, has become a mainstay field within clinical neuroscience. Being a multidisciplinary group of clinical network neuroscience experts based in The Netherlands, we often discuss the current state of the art and possible avenues for future investigations. These discussions revolve around questions like “How do dynamic processes alter the underlying structural network?” and “Can we use network neuroscience for disease classification?” This opinion paper is an incomplete overview of these discussions and expands on ten questions that may potentially advance the field. By no means intended as a review of the current state of the field, it is instead meant as a conversation starter and source of inspiration to others.

KW - Clinical application

KW - Computational modeling

KW - Connectome

KW - Graph analysis

KW - Network neuroscience

KW - Neuroimaging

KW - Neurophysiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077175678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077175678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077175678&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637334

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00103

DO - https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00103

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31637334

SN - 2472-1751

VL - 3

SP - 969

EP - 993

JO - Network Neuroscience

JF - Network Neuroscience

IS - 4

ER -

The road ahead in clinical network neuroscience

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this