TY - JOUR
T1 - Value of an Immediate Intravesical Instillation of Mitomycin C in Patients with Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
T2 - A Prospective Multicentre Randomised Study in 2243 patients [Figure presented]
AU - Bosschieter, Judith
AU - Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.
AU - van Ginkel, Tessa
AU - Vis, André N.
AU - Witte, Birgit
AU - Newling, Don
AU - Beckers, Goedele M. A.
AU - van Moorselaar, R. Jeroen A.
PY - 2018/2/1
Y1 - 2018/2/1
N2 - Background The efficacy of an immediate single chemotherapy instillation after transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT) in patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains a topic of debate. Evidence is even more scarce when an immediate instillation is followed by adjuvant instillations. Objective To compare the effect of a mitomycin C (MMC) instillation within 24 h to an instillation 2 wk after TURBT in patients with NMIBC with or without adjuvant instillations. Design, Setting, and participants Between 1998 and 2003, 2844 NMIBC patients were randomised for immediate versus delayed MMC instillation after TURBT. Patients were categorised in low-risk (LOR), intermediate-risk (IMR), and high-risk (HIR) groups. Total numbers of instillations in these groups were 1, 9, and 15, respectively. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary end point was 3-yr recurrence risk for the IMR and HIR groups and 5-yr risk for the LOR group. Secondary outcomes were time to recurrence and incidence of adverse events. Analyses were performed with the log-rank test, Cox-regression, and χ2 test in SPSS. Results and limitations A total of 2243 patients were eligible on an intention-to-treat basis. Recurrence risks were 43% and 46% in the LOR group (5-yr follow-up, p = 0.11), 20% and 32% in the IMR group (3-yr follow-up, p = 0.037), and 28% and 35% in the HIR group (3-yr follow-up, p = 0.007), for an immediate and a delayed instillation, respectively. For all patients, the recurrence risk was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24–30) in the immediate and 36% (95% CI, 33–39) in the delayed instillation group (p < 0.001) with a 27% reduction in relative recurrence risk (hazard ratio: 0.73, 95% CI, 0.63–0.85, p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between treatment groups (immediate instillation 25%, delayed instillation 22%, p = 0.08). The risk groups in our study differ slightly from the current guidelines, which is a limitation of our study. Conclusions An immediate, single instillation after TURBT reduces the recurrence risk in NMIBC patients, independent of the number of adjuvant installations. Patient summary A single instillation of chemotherapy after the resection of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer reduces the recurrence risk, even if patients are treated with an adjuvant schedule of instillations. An intravesical instillation with mitomycin C within 24 h after transurethral resection of a bladder tumour reduces the risk of recurrence in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, independent of the number of adjuvant installations.
AB - Background The efficacy of an immediate single chemotherapy instillation after transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT) in patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains a topic of debate. Evidence is even more scarce when an immediate instillation is followed by adjuvant instillations. Objective To compare the effect of a mitomycin C (MMC) instillation within 24 h to an instillation 2 wk after TURBT in patients with NMIBC with or without adjuvant instillations. Design, Setting, and participants Between 1998 and 2003, 2844 NMIBC patients were randomised for immediate versus delayed MMC instillation after TURBT. Patients were categorised in low-risk (LOR), intermediate-risk (IMR), and high-risk (HIR) groups. Total numbers of instillations in these groups were 1, 9, and 15, respectively. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Primary end point was 3-yr recurrence risk for the IMR and HIR groups and 5-yr risk for the LOR group. Secondary outcomes were time to recurrence and incidence of adverse events. Analyses were performed with the log-rank test, Cox-regression, and χ2 test in SPSS. Results and limitations A total of 2243 patients were eligible on an intention-to-treat basis. Recurrence risks were 43% and 46% in the LOR group (5-yr follow-up, p = 0.11), 20% and 32% in the IMR group (3-yr follow-up, p = 0.037), and 28% and 35% in the HIR group (3-yr follow-up, p = 0.007), for an immediate and a delayed instillation, respectively. For all patients, the recurrence risk was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24–30) in the immediate and 36% (95% CI, 33–39) in the delayed instillation group (p < 0.001) with a 27% reduction in relative recurrence risk (hazard ratio: 0.73, 95% CI, 0.63–0.85, p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between treatment groups (immediate instillation 25%, delayed instillation 22%, p = 0.08). The risk groups in our study differ slightly from the current guidelines, which is a limitation of our study. Conclusions An immediate, single instillation after TURBT reduces the recurrence risk in NMIBC patients, independent of the number of adjuvant installations. Patient summary A single instillation of chemotherapy after the resection of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer reduces the recurrence risk, even if patients are treated with an adjuvant schedule of instillations. An intravesical instillation with mitomycin C within 24 h after transurethral resection of a bladder tumour reduces the risk of recurrence in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, independent of the number of adjuvant installations.
KW - Bladder cancer
KW - Bladder neoplasms: Mitomycin C
KW - Intravesical chemotherapy
KW - Non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85021862554&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28705539
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021862554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.038
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.038
M3 - Article
C2 - 28705539
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 73
SP - 226
EP - 232
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 2
ER -