TY - JOUR
T1 - Een vragenlijstonderzoek naar de mening van clinici, patiënten en naasten over computertools in de geheugenpolikliniek
T2 - zin of onzin?
AU - van Gils, Aniek M.
AU - Visser, Leonie N. C.
AU - Hendriksen, Heleen M. A.
AU - Muller, Majon
AU - Bouwman, Femke H.
AU - van der Flier, Wiesje M.
AU - Rhodius-Meester, Hanneke F. M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, Vilans. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Computer tools based on artificial intelligence could aid clinicians in memory clinics by supporting diagnostic decision-making and communicating diagnosis and prognosis. We aimed to identify preferences of end-users, and barriers and facilitators for using computer tools in memory clinics. Methods: Between July and October 2020, we invited European clinicians (n=109, age 45±10y; 47% female) to participate in an online questionnaire. A second questionnaire was sent to patients (n=50, age 73±8y, 34% female) with subjective cognitive complaints (SCD, n=21), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=16) and dementia (n=13) and care partners (n=46, 65±12y, 54% female). Results: The vast majority (75%) of all participants positively valued the use of computer tools in memory clinics. Facilitating factors included user-friendliness and increased diagnostic accuracy. Barriers included (doubts relating) reliability and validity of the tool and loss of clinical autonomy. The participants believe that tools should be used in addition to the current working method and not as a replacement. Discussion: Our results provide an important step in the iterative process of developing computer tools for memory clinics in co-creation with end-users and could guide successful implementation.
AB - Introduction: Computer tools based on artificial intelligence could aid clinicians in memory clinics by supporting diagnostic decision-making and communicating diagnosis and prognosis. We aimed to identify preferences of end-users, and barriers and facilitators for using computer tools in memory clinics. Methods: Between July and October 2020, we invited European clinicians (n=109, age 45±10y; 47% female) to participate in an online questionnaire. A second questionnaire was sent to patients (n=50, age 73±8y, 34% female) with subjective cognitive complaints (SCD, n=21), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=16) and dementia (n=13) and care partners (n=46, 65±12y, 54% female). Results: The vast majority (75%) of all participants positively valued the use of computer tools in memory clinics. Facilitating factors included user-friendliness and increased diagnostic accuracy. Barriers included (doubts relating) reliability and validity of the tool and loss of clinical autonomy. The participants believe that tools should be used in addition to the current working method and not as a replacement. Discussion: Our results provide an important step in the iterative process of developing computer tools for memory clinics in co-creation with end-users and could guide successful implementation.
KW - Artificial Intelligence
KW - Dementia
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Digital tools
KW - Prognosis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85151347565&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37022048
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151347565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2023.01.03
DO - https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2023.01.03
M3 - Article
C2 - 37022048
SN - 0167-9228
VL - 54
JO - Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie
JF - Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie
IS - 1
ER -