TY - JOUR
T1 - Weighing psychosocial factors in relatives for the risk of psychopathology
T2 - a study of patients with depressive and anxiety disorders and their siblings
AU - van Sprang, Eleonore D.
AU - Maciejewski, Dominique F.
AU - Milaneschi, Yuri
AU - Kullberg, Marie-Louise J.
AU - Elzinga, Bernet M.
AU - van Hemert, Albert M.
AU - Hartman, Catharina A.
AU - Penninx, Brenda W. J. H.
N1 - Funding Information: The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) is funded through the Geestkracht program of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research and Development (ZonMw, Grant number 10-000-1002) and financial contributions by participating universities and mental health care organizations (Amsterdam University Medical—Vrije Universiteit VU, GGZ ingeest, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, GGZ Rivierduinen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Lentis, GGZ Friesland, GGZ Drenthe, Rob Giel Onderzoekscentrum). Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Purpose: Siblings of probands with depressive and anxiety disorders are at increased risk for psychopathology, but little is known about how risk factors operate within families to increase psychopathology for siblings. We examined the additional impact of psychosocial risk factors in probands—on top of or in combination with those in siblings—on depressive/anxious psychopathology in siblings. Methods: The sample included 636 participants (Mage = 49.7; 62.4% female) from 256 families, each including a proband with lifetime depressive and/or anxiety disorders and their sibling(s) (N = 380 proband-sibling pairs). Sixteen psychosocial risk factors were tested. In siblings, depressive and anxiety disorders were determined with standardized psychiatric interviews; symptom severity was measured using self-report questionnaires. Analyses were performed with mixed-effects models accounting for familial structure. Results: In siblings, various psychosocial risk factors (female gender, low income, childhood trauma, poor parental bonding, being single, smoking, hazardous alcohol use) were associated with higher symptomatology and likelihood of disorder. The presence of the same risk factor in probands was independently associated (low income, being single) with higher symptomatology in siblings or moderated (low education, childhood trauma, hazardous alcohol use)—by reducing its strength—the association between the risk factor and symptomatology in siblings. There was no additional impact of risk factors in probands on likelihood of disorder in siblings. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the importance of weighing psychosocial risk factors within a family context, as it may provide relevant information on the risk of affective psychopathology for individuals.
AB - Purpose: Siblings of probands with depressive and anxiety disorders are at increased risk for psychopathology, but little is known about how risk factors operate within families to increase psychopathology for siblings. We examined the additional impact of psychosocial risk factors in probands—on top of or in combination with those in siblings—on depressive/anxious psychopathology in siblings. Methods: The sample included 636 participants (Mage = 49.7; 62.4% female) from 256 families, each including a proband with lifetime depressive and/or anxiety disorders and their sibling(s) (N = 380 proband-sibling pairs). Sixteen psychosocial risk factors were tested. In siblings, depressive and anxiety disorders were determined with standardized psychiatric interviews; symptom severity was measured using self-report questionnaires. Analyses were performed with mixed-effects models accounting for familial structure. Results: In siblings, various psychosocial risk factors (female gender, low income, childhood trauma, poor parental bonding, being single, smoking, hazardous alcohol use) were associated with higher symptomatology and likelihood of disorder. The presence of the same risk factor in probands was independently associated (low income, being single) with higher symptomatology in siblings or moderated (low education, childhood trauma, hazardous alcohol use)—by reducing its strength—the association between the risk factor and symptomatology in siblings. There was no additional impact of risk factors in probands on likelihood of disorder in siblings. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the importance of weighing psychosocial risk factors within a family context, as it may provide relevant information on the risk of affective psychopathology for individuals.
KW - Anxiety
KW - Depression
KW - Familial clustering
KW - Psychosocial risk
KW - Siblings
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85148072947&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36790574
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148072947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-023-02432-0
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-023-02432-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 36790574
SN - 0933-7954
VL - 58
SP - 1213
EP - 1226
JO - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
JF - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
IS - 8
ER -